history: May 2009 Archives

Can we talk about an Australian photography, as we once used to talk about an Australian art or Australian culture? Does it make any sense to talk about an Australian photography in the globalised world of the 21st century? Should we do so?

Gayle+IBare.jpg Gayle and I, bare and exposed

Between the 1940s and 1960s Bernard Smith published three books that established paradigms for the interpretation of Australian art, albeit in European art historical terms. These shaped the emerging discipline of Australian art history onto a trajectory that would not be shaken for another two decades, a direction that continued in the 1980s' and then 1990s' emphasis on the postmodernist strategy of appropriation.

In the first, Place, Taste, Tradition Smith argued that vision had a history in that the English colonists saw the Australian landscape with English eyes and they endowed that landscape with the formal qualities of landscapes to which they were aesthetically accustomed in England. The flora, fauna, landscape and indigenous people were all It was the other. constructed as exotic, repugnant and grotesque. It was the other, but also an imaginary fantasia full of wonders and monsters. Smith's claim was that art and identity result from the negotiations of traditions and locations, and not of the soil.

April 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

Further Reading

Archives

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the history category from May 2009.

history: April 2009 is the previous archive.

history: January 2010 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Powered by Movable Type 4.26
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.